Daily life in Casablanca during the 1950s

A grounded look at routines in Morocco's largest port city, where apartment blocks, markets, bus and trolleybus routes, factory work, cafes, courtyards, and self-built neighborhoods shaped daily life.

Casablanca in the 1950s was a fast-growing Atlantic port, commercial center, and industrial city. The 1951–52 census counted about 682,400 residents: approximately 472,900 people classified as Moroccan Muslims, 74,800 as Moroccan Jews, and 134,700 as foreigners.[1] Those official categories flattened differences of nationality, language, class, and legal position, but they make clear that no single household can stand for the city. Everyday life was shaped by the French protectorate system at the start of the decade, Moroccan independence in 1956, rural migration, wage work, crowded housing, and the practical demands of moving food, water, cloth, goods, and people through a rapidly expanding city. The old medina, European-built center, Habous or New Medina, industrial districts, port neighborhoods, villas, apartments, shantytowns, workshops, markets, schools, cinemas, mosques, synagogues, churches, cafes, buses, and electric trolleybuses belonged to unequal but connected urban worlds.

The decade also divides into distinct political phases. Protests in and around Carrières Centrales on 7–8 December 1952 were met with lethal colonial repression; the surviving record does not yield an agreed death toll, and a later scholarly chronology says probably more than one hundred people were killed.[2] Sultan Mohammed V was exiled in 1953, returned in November 1955, and the French protectorate ended in March 1956. The Union marocaine du travail (UMT), founded in Casablanca in March 1955, made organized labor part of the struggle over independence and the postcolonial state.[3] Strikes, police checks, political violence, and administrative change did not define every day, but at moments they interrupted transport and work, made a person's address or papers consequential, and altered the institutions through which residents sought jobs, schooling, and public services.

Housing and Living Spaces

Housing in 1950s Casablanca showed the city's sharp social divisions. Wealthier European and Moroccan families could occupy villas, modern apartments, or larger houses with electricity, piped water, tiled bathrooms, servants' rooms, and easier access to private transport. The European-built center had apartment blocks, shops at street level, offices, cafes, and wide streets planned under the protectorate. The old medina was a different, increasingly subdivided domestic and commercial fabric. Habous, commonly called the New Medina, was not an extension of the old city but a planned Moroccan quarter created under colonial rule, combining courtyard houses, shops, religious buildings, and later dense additions. A 1953 study of Derb Carlotti, based on field inquiries made in 1940 and 1952, describes the New Medina's rapid growth and the adaptation of former rural residents to an urban setting; its terminology and judgments should be read as those of a colonial-era observer.[4]

Many working families lived in crowded quarters near factories, markets, and transport lines. Rural migration and limited affordable housing pushed thousands of residents into bidonvilles, the self-built settlements that became one of Casablanca's defining urban features. Shelter could be assembled from salvaged boards, flattened tins, packing material, earth, or corrugated metal and altered as money and tenure allowed. A room might hold bedding, cooking vessels, stored clothing, tools, and the belongings of several relatives. Lanes, shared water points, public fountains, and small outdoor areas consequently carried domestic as well as public work. Such descriptions come mainly from planners, officials, photographs, and later interviews; they show crowding and materials more readily than they recover how every household organized its space.[5]

Carrières Centrales makes both the housing crisis and the limits of reform unusually visible. In the early 1950s Michel Écochard's planning service laid out low-rise dwellings on an eight-by-eight-meter grid, generally combining two rooms with a private courtyard, while ATBAT-Afrique tested the nearby Nid d'Abeille and Sémiramis apartment blocks with elevated or screened patio spaces.[6] The designs attempted to combine high density, household privacy, and neighborhood facilities, but they also sorted residents through colonial categories and translated diverse Moroccan households into a narrow architectural model. Later research using archives and interviews finds that costs, low incomes, a large housing backlog, and minimal resident participation restricted the program's reach; rehousing could displace segregation rather than end it.[5]

Daily domestic work depended on infrastructure. Better-served homes might have private taps, electricity, a gas cooker, a refrigerator, or a dedicated laundry area; poorer households were more likely to carry water, manage charcoal or kerosene fuel, wash clothes by hand, and protect rooms from damp, dust, and summer heat. Women commonly carried much of the cooking, cleaning, child care, visiting, and clothing care, sometimes alongside paid sewing, washing, food preparation, or factory work. Household roles varied, however, especially among people living alone, sharing rooms with coworkers, or relying on extended kin. Housing was therefore not simply shelter. It affected commuting time, access to school and water, exposure to illness, family privacy, and the labor required to keep daily life orderly.

Food and Daily Meals

Daily food in Casablanca drew on Moroccan household traditions, Atlantic supply lines, rural markets, and French colonial urban habits. Bread, couscous and other semolina preparations, pulses, olives, onions, tomatoes, greens, eggs, fish, meat, tea, coffee, sugar, and seasonal fruit were available in the city, but the surviving evidence does not support one representative menu. Income, religious practice, region of origin, household size, season, and access to a kitchen all mattered. Bread, vegetables, pulses, and stews could stretch a budget; meat or fish varied in frequency, while couscous and more elaborate dishes also carried meanings of family gathering, hospitality, and occasion.

Markets were central to provisioning. Residents bought from souks, neighborhood grocers, bakeries, fish sellers, vegetable stalls, butchers, dairy vendors, and street hawkers. Casablanca's large fish-processing sector should not be treated as proof that canned sardines were a universal local staple. A 1951 survey counted 32 fish canneries in Casablanca but reported that the Moroccan market absorbed only about 3 percent of the country's canned-fish production; most was exported.[7] A later historical study likewise emphasizes that the protectorate developed the industry around export and inexpensive local labor rather than Moroccan consumption.[8] Fresh fish still reached urban markets, but price and supply determined access. Limited cold storage in many homes encouraged small, frequent purchases, while dried pulses, shared dishes, leftovers, oil, and bread helped households manage cash and waste.

Public eating reflected the mixed city. Cafes served coffee, mint tea, pastries, cigarettes, conversation, and newspapers. Workers bought snacks, sandwiches, stews, fried foods, fruit, or tea near factories, transport stops, markets, and the port. European restaurants, hotel dining rooms, and patisseries belonged to a different price world from the everyday stalls and modest cafes used by workers and students. Domestic servants and cooks prepared meals in wealthier homes while maintaining their own household economies elsewhere. Food therefore linked Casablanca's households to markets, gendered labor, class difference, and the daily geography of work.

Work and Labor

Work in 1950s Casablanca was organized around the port, commerce, construction, transport, food processing, textiles, administration, domestic service, small trade, and informal labor. Dockworkers, sailors, warehouse hands, truck drivers, mechanics, clerks, typists, shop assistants, teachers, nurses, builders, carpenters, metalworkers, tailors, bakers, butchers, street sellers, and factory workers all formed part of the urban economy. A contemporary geographical survey attributed 60 percent of the protectorate's manufacturing establishments to Casablanca and identified food processing, metallurgy, and chemicals as leading branches.[9] It is valuable for mapping the formal industrial city—factories, lorries, warehouses, workshops, and the port—but its colonial viewpoint pays far less attention to informal and household labor.

Industrial and service work created new routines for many Moroccan families. Men were prominent in factories, docks, construction, transport, shops, and municipal services. Women worked as domestic servants, seamstresses, laundry workers, food sellers, midwives, nurses, teachers, family helpers, and factory hands, while also carrying much unpaid cooking, washing, child care, and kin support. The 1951 fish-canning survey, which included Casablanca's plants in its count, reported that women predominated in the industry's workforce across Morocco; it does not establish their exact share or tasks in each Casablanca factory.[7] Children and teenagers might help with errands, apprenticeships, sibling care, carrying, shop work, or craft tasks when household income required it. Stable salaried jobs brought status, but much of the city depended on casual work, household production, and daily negotiation.

Commuting shaped the working day. Buses and electric trolleybuses joined bicycles, carts, taxis, lorries, and walking in connecting residential districts to the port, factories, offices, schools, and markets. A worker's address could decide whether a job was practical, especially when shifts began early or ended after dark. Language and education mattered: Moroccan Arabic, French, Amazigh languages, Spanish, and Judeo-Arabic appeared in different homes, shops, schools, and workplaces, while French literacy opened some clerical and administrative paths. Colonial schooling was itself divided among institutions for Europeans, Muslim Moroccans, and Jewish Moroccans, with markedly unequal funding and access, particularly for girls; independence began a reorganization rather than producing an instant common system.[10] Work life therefore mixed formal employment, apprenticeship, informal selling, household production, and reliance on relatives and neighborhood contacts.

Social Structure

Casablanca's social structure in the 1950s was layered by colonial status, class, religion, language, gender, occupation, and length of residence in the city. Europeans, established Moroccan merchants, professionals, administrators, property owners, and better-paid employees generally had greater access to secure housing, schools, medical care, and consumer goods. Workers, recent migrants, servants, street vendors, and residents of bidonvilles were more likely to face crowding, weak legal protection, and unstable income. The census categories cited above are useful for scale but should not be mistaken for three internally uniform communities.[1]

Family networks were essential. Relatives could help newcomers find rooms, jobs, apprenticeships, marriage connections, credit, and childcare. Neighborhood ties mattered in the medina, Habous, bidonvilles, apartment buildings, and market districts, where news moved through shops, courtyards, mosques, synagogues, cafes, hammams, schools, and workplaces. Respectability might be expressed through clean clothes, hospitality, religious observance, school attendance, steady work, and care for relatives, but expectations differed between families and communities. Women often bore particular responsibility for visiting, cooking, washing, clothing care, and kin obligations without being confined to the home.

Moroccan Jewish life was especially varied and mobile during the decade. The 1951–52 census counted roughly 74,800 Jewish residents in Casablanca, about 11 percent of the city's population.[1] Some families were long-established merchants, artisans, professionals, or wage earners; others had arrived from smaller towns or southern and Atlas communities and lived in poorer parts of the mellah. Archival migration data studied by Yann Scioldo-Zürcher show that among Casablanca residents who left for Israel between August 1955 and August 1956, 57 percent of adults over twenty had been born elsewhere, underlining that internal migration preceded international departure.[11] Emigration, schooling, language, and income reshaped households unevenly: departures could separate kin and close businesses or institutions, while many Jewish residents remained in the city through the end of the decade.

Urban life also produced constant contact across social boundaries. Bus and trolleybus stops, markets, port streets, cinemas, football grounds, cafes, administrative offices, and hospitals brought different groups into shared spaces. Yet proximity did not mean equality. Address, accent, clothing, school language, and occupation could mark status immediately. Education offered a path into clerical, technical, or professional work, but access was uneven and household income could limit how long a child remained in school. Casablanca's society was therefore dynamic and unequal: a city of migration and aspiration where everyday survival depended on both urban opportunity and dense personal networks.

Tools and Technology

Daily technology in Casablanca combined modern urban systems with household improvisation. Buses, trolleybuses, taxis, lorries, port cranes, railway connections, telephones, radios, typewriters, sewing machines, cinema projectors, electric lights, scales, cash registers, printing presses, and factory machinery were visible in different parts of the city. Offices used ledgers, carbon paper, files, stamps, typewriters, and telephones. Shops relied on counters, scales, baskets, crates, display cases, and account books. Workshops used hand tools, sewing machines, presses, repair benches, and small motors where power was available.

Inside homes, technology depended strongly on income. Some households had radios, electric irons, refrigerators, fans, tiled bathrooms, and gas cookers. Others relied on charcoal braziers, kerosene lamps, clay cooking vessels, metal basins, buckets, washboards, hand mills, sewing needles, and shared taps. Radios mattered because they carried music, religious programming, news, advertisements, and public speech into homes and cafes. A sewing machine could support both clothing repair and paid work. A bicycle or handcart could turn mobility into income. Technology was therefore practical rather than evenly modern: each tool mattered through time saved, money earned, information received, or household labor reduced.

Clothing and Materials

Clothing in 1950s Casablanca reflected climate, occupation, class, religion, gender, and ideas of urban respectability. Many Moroccan men wore djellabas, burnouses, shirts, trousers, skullcaps, fezzes, sandals, or leather shoes depending on setting and income. Office workers, students, European residents, and some urban professionals wore suits, jackets, ties, dresses, skirts, blouses, hats, and polished shoes. Women wore haiks, djellabas, caftans, dresses, skirts, blouses, head coverings, slippers, and jewelry according to family background, neighborhood, occasion, and degree of public movement. Work clothes were more durable and practical, especially for port labor, factories, kitchens, construction, and domestic service.

Materials included wool, cotton, linen, leather, silk for special garments, rayon, nylon, and imported or locally sold blends. Tailors, seamstresses, market cloth sellers, cobblers, laundresses, and secondhand traders kept clothing in circulation. Laundry and ironing were demanding household tasks, especially where water had to be carried or shared. Mending extended the life of garments, and children's clothing often passed between siblings or cousins. Clothing could mark rural origin, urban aspiration, school discipline, religious propriety, European influence, or job status. In Casablanca, dress was a daily negotiation between comfort, modesty, labor, public appearance, and the mixed expectations of a changing city.

Daily life in 1950s Casablanca was shaped by port work, migration, dense markets, colonial-era planning, independence-era change, and uneven access to housing and services. Modern apartments, radios, cinemas, trolleybuses, and offices existed beside courtyard homes, informal settlements, hand labor, shared water points, and crowded rooms. The city's everyday history lies in how families used work, food, clothing, tools, kinship, and neighborhood ties to make a livable routine in a fast-growing Atlantic metropolis.

References

Berrada, Abdallah. “Le peuplement du Maroc.” In Répartition de la population, urbanisation et migration. Haut-Commissariat au Plan du Royaume du Maroc, 1998. See especially the 1951–52 census table. https://www.hcp.ma/file/231656/
“Chronologie.” Les Cahiers de l'Institut d'Histoire du Temps Présent 38 (1997): 151–155. https://www.persee.fr/doc/ihtp_0769-4504_1997_num_38_1_2433
Agwani, M. S. “Morocco: From Protectorate to Independence.” International Studies 1, no. 1 (1959): 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/002088175900100103
Miège, Jean-Louis. “La nouvelle Médina de Casablanca: Le derb Carlotti.” Les Cahiers d'Outre-Mer 6, no. 23 (1953): 244–257. https://doi.org/10.3406/caoum.1953.1859
House, Jim. “Shantytowns and Rehousing in Late Colonial Algiers and Casablanca.” In France's Modernising Mission: Citizenship, Welfare and the Ends of Empire, 133–163. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55133-7_6
Dainese, Elisa. “From the Charter of Athens to the ‘Habitat’: CIAM 9 and the African Grids.” The Journal of Architecture 24, no. 3 (2019): 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2019.1606025
Raynal, René. “L'industrie de la conserve des poissons au Maroc.” Annales de Géographie 60, no. 319 (1951): 153. https://www.persee.fr/doc/geo_0003-4010_1951_num_60_319_13227
Caquel, Marie. “L'impact du protectorat français sur l'industrie du poisson au Maroc.” French Cultural Studies 26, no. 2 (2015): 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957155815571507
Vassal, Serge. “Les industries de Casablanca.” Les Cahiers d'Outre-Mer 4, no. 13 (1951): 61–79. https://doi.org/10.3406/caoum.1951.1718
Allègre, Amélie, Oana Borcan, and Christa Brunnschweiler. “Gendered Impacts of Colonial Education: The Role of Access and Norms Transmission in French Morocco.” University of East Anglia School of Economics Working Paper 2025-02, 2025. https://ueaeco.github.io/working-papers/papers/ueaeco/UEA-ECO-2025-02.pdf
Scioldo-Zürcher, Yann. “Overview of Moroccan Jewish Migration: Internal Migration and Departures from Morocco.” In Les Cahiers du Musée Berbère III, 25–40. Fondation Jardin Majorelle, 2017. https://www.jardinmajorelle.com/pdf/cahier_musee_berbere_iii_english.pdf